
On Oct. 30, 2026, U.S. District Judge Jennifer Rochon in Manhattan ordered the immediate removal of three pro‑Trump video ads that the government had posted online. The judge said the ads were “purely partisan” and likely broke the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, which bars federal money from being used for publicity or propaganda.
The three clips included a 33‑second video titled “$5,000 to Americans,” in which President Trump warned of an economic depression if Democrats win and promised $5,000 for each voter if Republicans win. Another ad, “Every Democrat Voted Against No Tax on Tips,” attacked Democratic candidates for opposing parts of Trump’s agenda. The third, “The Cost of Socialism,” singled out candidates linked to the Democratic Socialists of America and urged voters to avoid them.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Rochon relied on Section 718 of the Financial Services and General Government Appropriations Act, which prohibits federal funding for “publicity or propaganda purposes.” The judge noted that the ads directly asked voters to support one party over another in the upcoming midterm election, a clear violation of that ban.
The ruling follows a prior injunction that barred the Department of Homeland Security from airing partisan ads on television. Common Cause, a watchdog group, sued the government for using Executive Office of the President funds to run the ads online. The judge limited the injunction to the three ads she found “substantially likely” to breach the law, but ordered the government to pull them from all official sites and cancel any further posting plans.
For ordinary citizens, the decision reinforces that taxpayer money cannot be used to promote a political party. If you see government‑sponsored political ads, you can report them to watchdog groups or the Office of Special Counsel. The order does not set a deadline for future ads, but any similar use of federal funds for partisan messaging could be subject to court action.
Anyone who believes a government advertisement crosses the line should keep a copy of the material and note where it appeared. Consulting an attorney may help determine whether a violation has occurred and what legal steps are available.
The order signals tighter judicial scrutiny of any government use of taxpayer money for political messaging, protecting voters from partisan influence.
Federal entities will need to vet future communications to ensure they do not cross the line into partisan advocacy, increasing compliance burdens.
Organizations like Common Cause may pursue additional actions against similar ads, encouraging more citizen oversight of government advertising.
Agencies might limit political content altogether to avoid litigation, which could reduce public awareness of legitimate government programs.
If you see a government‑funded ad that appears partisan, document it and consider reporting it to a watchdog group or legal counsel.
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 30, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Uber, Amazon, and Instacart filed a federal lawsuit against New York City to block a new law restricting how delivery apps can deactivate workers.
Haifa Smoked Fish of Queens, NY is recalling about 560 lb of cold‑smoked sprats sold in NY, NJ and PA after FDA found possible Clostridium botulinum contamination.
U.S. District Judge Jesse Furman ordered the Trump administration to reinstate Maurene Comey and pay back wages, finding her 2025 dismissal unconstitutional.
New York City voted to ban horse-drawn carriages by June 2028, prompting drivers and their union to prepare a federal lawsuit against the legislation.
A federal judge struck down New York's ban on purchasing body armor, ruling it violates the Second Amendment rights of citizens seeking self-defense.
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in New York by practice area.