
A coalition of major app-based delivery companies, including Uber, Amazon, and Instacart, filed a lawsuit in Manhattan against New York City. The legal action, launched late Wednesday evening, aims to block a city ordinance that prevents delivery services from deactivating contracted couriers without just cause or a bona fide economic reason.
The companies argue that the delivery deactivation law unconstitutionally interferes with existing contractual agreements. Represented by attorneys from Sidley Austin and Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, the firms claim the legislation strips them of their business judgment in managing who accesses their platforms.
In their 94-page complaint, the delivery apps outline seven separate counts against the city. They argue that the legislation violates the First Amendment and 14th Amendment, as well as the contracts, free speech, and due process clauses of the U.S. Constitution.
The apps state that deactivations are relatively rare and primarily involve safety or fraud concerns. According to the lawsuit, the ordinance would force companies to reopen past deactivation cases where workers were removed due to fraud or safety violations, which platforms argue could put customers and retail partners at risk.
Source: Courthouse News Service
The lawsuit arrives amid significant industry shifts, including a $17 billion deal involving DoorDash and Instacart. City officials have also maintained active oversight of delivery platforms, pointing to a settlement involving a $131.5 million recovery for underpaid workers.
Representatives for New York City did not immediately respond to requests for comment regarding the new lawsuit. The delivery companies also pointed to a prior court decision that blocked a similar ride-share app ordinance in the Southern District of New York.
For delivery couriers working in the city, the lawsuit creates uncertainty regarding how app platforms handle account removals and safety standards. The delivery companies contend that forcing them to restore accounts removed years ago could compromise platform trust and security.
Meanwhile, city officials continue to monitor platform operations following recent wage and tip settlements. Readers facing complex employment disputes or contract issues may find that talking to a lawyer helps clarify their rights under local regulations.
The legal challenge leaves the enforcement of new worker protection rules in limbo while the federal court considers constitutional claims.
Companies argue that restricting deactivations prevents them from keeping fraudulent or unsafe accounts off their delivery applications.
The lawsuit unfolds as major delivery platforms navigate massive industry consolidation and recent city wage enforcement actions.
Affected workers and local businesses should monitor upcoming court decisions from the Southern District of New York regarding the law.
| Plaintiff / Defendant | Key Position |
|---|---|
| Uber, Amazon, Instacart | Law unconstitutionally interferes with contracts and deactivation standards. |
| New York City | Enforces worker protections, including recent wage settlements and deactivation rules. |
Source: Courthouse News Service
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 29, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Haifa Smoked Fish of Queens, NY is recalling about 560 lb of cold‑smoked sprats sold in NY, NJ and PA after FDA found possible Clostridium botulinum contamination.
New York City voted to ban horse-drawn carriages by June 2028, prompting drivers and their union to prepare a federal lawsuit against the legislation.
Federal safety officials proposed $648,094 in penalties against six contractors after finding an unstable 75-foot excavation face at a Monroe, New York building site.
Family Farmstead Dairy recalls raw mild cheddar cheese distributed in New York and New Jersey due to potential E. coli O157:H7 contamination.
A New York appeals court ruled that energy company ads describing fuels as cleaner did not deceive buyers under municipal consumer protection laws.
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in New York by practice area.