California AG Bonta Secures Order Blocking Immigration Conditions on DHS Grants
On November 9, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced that a U.S. District Court in Rhode Island issued an order requiring the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to drop immigration‑related conditions from its fiscal year 2026 grant awards. The ruling enforces a 2025 injunction that already barred the Trump Administration from tying unrelated grant money to its immigration agenda.
Court Finds New Conditions Violate Prior Injunction
The judge determined that the immigration conditions DHS tried to add for FY 2026 fall within the scope of the earlier judgment, which covers future fiscal years and “materially similar” requirements. As a result, DHS must re‑issue award letters without the contested conditions and is barred from enforcing them against the plaintiff states.
Why the Decision Matters for State Funding
California and dozens of other states receive hundreds of millions of dollars each year from DHS for counterterrorism, emergency preparedness, cybersecurity and other public‑safety programs. Those funds are not linked to civil immigration enforcement, and the court’s order keeps them that way.
Impact on Everyday Residents
The ruling does not change any direct services you receive, but it protects state and local safety programs from political strings attached to their funding. Residents can expect continued support for disaster response, cyber‑security initiatives and anti‑terrorism efforts without new immigration‑related requirements.
Next Steps and What to Watch
Attorney General Bonta filed the motion with a coalition that includes attorneys general from Illinois, New Jersey, Rhode Island, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin. The coalition will monitor DHS compliance and may return to court if the agency tries to impose similar conditions again.
For most people, no immediate action is required. However, if you rely on state‑funded safety programs, staying informed about grant funding and any changes to program requirements is advisable.
What this means: our conclusions
- Good newsSafety Grants Stay Unrestricted
The order keeps billions in public‑safety funding free from immigration strings, preserving essential services for communities.
- Good newsFederal Agencies Face Limits on Policy Tying
The ruling signals that the administration cannot use grant money to push unrelated policy goals.
- Good newsState Coalitions Prove Effective
A multistate coalition successfully used the courts to protect state funding, showing collective legal power.
- What to watchWatch for Future Grant Conditions
The administration may try new tactics; courts will likely continue to scrutinize any similar conditions.
- What to doConsult a Lawyer if Concerned
If you rely on state‑funded safety programs, a lawyer can help you understand any changes and protect your interests.
- order oag.ca.gov
This article is general information based on California Attorney General and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published November 10, 2026.
Source: California Attorney General
Justice Department Withdraws Lawsuit Targeting California Voter List of Alleged Noncitizens
The Trump administration’s Justice Department voluntarily dismissed its suit seeking to block mail‑in ballots for up to 20,000 voters on a DHS non‑citizen list, after losing at the district, appellate and Supreme Court levels.
Trump administration asks Supreme Court to set aside 20,000 California ballots on citizenship doubts
The Justice Department filed an emergency request to the Supreme Court to segregate 20,000 ballots in California pending citizenship verification, a move rejected by lower courts and criticized by election experts.
Federal Court Rejects Trump Administration Request to Segregate 20,000 California Ballots
A U.S. district court denied a request to separate 20,000 California mail-in ballots, citing a lack of legal basis and risks of voter disenfranchisement.
Ninth Circuit Rejects Federal Emergency Appeal Over California Mail-In Ballots
A federal appeals court has thrown out an emergency bid to block California from counting tens of thousands of mail-in ballots before the upcoming election.
Ninth Circuit Rejects Trump Administration’s Attempt to Disqualify 20,000 Mail‑in Ballots in California
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit dismissed the Trump Administration’s request to set aside about 20,000 mail‑in ballots it claimed were likely cast by non‑citizens, preserving California voters’ rights.
Find a lawyer in California
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.