
On Oct. 26, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied a request from the Trump Administration to segregate and not count roughly 20,000 mail‑in ballots in California. The administration had argued the ballots were likely cast by non‑citizens, but the court said it lacked authority to act at this early stage.
The Ninth Circuit ruled that the federal government cannot bypass normal trial‑court procedures to obtain an injunction. It also found the administration had no legal basis to override California’s election laws, which the state says protect the integrity of voting.
Source: California Attorney General
During oral arguments, the Trump Administration could not explain where it got a list of about 20,000 purported California voters, why the list contained many errors, or what third parties were involved. A preliminary check of 200 names by Los Angeles County officials showed more than half were cancelled or inactive, 38.9% listed a U.S. birthplace, and 71.2% had no voting history. In Mendocino County, every name on the list lived outside the county.
The decision means all mail‑in ballots will continue to be counted under California’s existing safeguards. Voters do not need to take any special action; they can vote early, use a vote‑center, or drop ballots in a mailbox as usual. The ruling also prevents a potential disruption to an election already underway.
Attorney General Rob Bonta said the ruling is a “speed bump” to what he called the administration’s “unlawful overreach.” He warned that the federal government may try other tactics, but the court’s order reaffirms that states and Congress—not the President—control election rules. Governor Gavin Newsom echoed the sentiment, urging Californians to stay engaged in the democratic process.
Anyone who feels their voting rights are threatened should consider consulting an attorney, especially if they receive notice of a ballot challenge.
The ruling confirms that California, not the federal executive, controls how elections are run, protecting voters’ rights.
The decision limits the Trump Administration’s ability to intervene in state elections without proper court orders.
The administration may pursue other legal avenues, so watch for additional filings that could affect upcoming elections.
By keeping all ballots in play, the ruling helps maintain public trust in the voting process.
If you receive a notice questioning your ballot, seek legal advice to protect your voting rights.
| Aspect | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Request to segregate 20,000 ballots | Dismissed by Ninth Circuit |
| Authority to act at early stage | Court said it lacked authority |
| Legal basis to override state law | None found |
Source: California Attorney General
This article is general information based on California Attorney General and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 27, 2026.
Source: California Attorney General
A federal appeals court has thrown out an emergency bid to block California from counting tens of thousands of mail-in ballots before the upcoming election.
The federal government is asking an appeals court to end a 40-year-old injunction requiring legal rights notifications for unaccompanied minor migrants.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta co-led a multistate coalition filing an amicus brief challenging warrantless civil immigration arrests by DHS.
The DOJ and DHS allege more than 20,000 likely noncitizens are registered to vote in California and have taken the state to federal court.
California Attorney General Rob Bonta alleges ICE’s nationwide arrest targets threaten court access and asks a federal judge to halt all immigration enforcement at California courthouses.
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.