RNC Sues Black Hawk County Auditor Over Denial of Voting Machine Seal Records
The Republican National Committee filed a lawsuit on Thursday against Black Hawk County Auditor Karen Showalter, alleging she refused to let RNC observers record the security seal numbers on voting machines during pre‑election testing.
The complaint says the auditor denied public observers the right to photograph or otherwise document the tamper‑evident tags placed on the equipment, despite Iowa law that makes such records public.
Legal dispute over public‑record access
The RNC argues that Iowa Code § 22.2 requires the seal numbers to be disclosed as public records. The committee says Showalter cited a county resolution and claimed the numbers were confidential, but Iowa Secretary of State Paul Pate recently told county auditors that logic‑and‑accuracy testing documents are public.
- 1Court reviews the RNC’s complaint and the auditor’s defenses
- 2If the court finds the records are public, it orders their release
- 3Auditor provides seal numbers to the RNC and possibly the public
- 4Potential civil penalty and attorney‑fee award to the RNC
Source: Courthouse News Service
What the seal numbers represent
Before each election, voting machines undergo logic and accuracy testing to confirm they tabulate votes correctly and reject over‑votes. After testing, each machine is sealed with a unique, tamper‑evident tag. Observers can record the tag numbers to verify the equipment has not been altered between testing and Election Day.
Potential impact for voters and election officials
If the court orders the release of the seal numbers, the public will have a way to confirm that the same machines tested before the election are the ones used on Election Day. This could increase confidence in the voting process for Iowa voters.
For election officials, the case underscores the need to treat seal records as public documents and to provide them promptly when requested.
What ordinary people can do
Voters and party observers should monitor the lawsuit’s progress. If a court orders the records released, they can request copies from the auditor’s office. No specific deadline is mentioned in the filing.
Anyone concerned about election transparency may consider contacting a lawyer to discuss whether they have standing to request records or to challenge a refusal.
Consulting an attorney can help clarify rights under Iowa’s public‑records law and advise on any next steps.
What this means: our conclusions
- Good newsIncreased transparency if records are released
A court order could give voters and observers direct proof that machines tested before the election are the same ones used on Election Day.
- What to watchAuditors may need to change record‑keeping practices
County officials could be required to treat seal numbers as public records and provide them promptly, reducing future disputes.
- RiskPotential cost for the auditor's office
The RNC is asking for a civil penalty and attorney fees, which could financially impact the county if the court sides with the committee.
- What to watchImplications for other states
The case may encourage similar challenges in other jurisdictions where officials claim election‑equipment data is confidential.
- What to doCheck your rights to election records
If you are a voter or observer, verify whether you can request seal numbers from your local auditor and consider legal help if denied.
| Party | Position |
|---|---|
| RNC | Requests release of seal numbers, civil penalty, attorney fees |
| Black Hawk County Auditor | Claims seal numbers are confidential under county resolution |
Source: Courthouse News Service
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 31, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Find a lawyer in Iowa
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in Iowa by practice area.