
On November 10, 2026, California Attorney General Rob Bonta co‑led a multistate coalition in filing formal opposition to a change made by the U.S. Department of Defense to the Federal Post Card Application, the form overseas voters use to register and request absentee ballots.
The change, implemented in August 2026 under the Trump administration, removed a checkbox that read, “I am a U.S. citizen living outside the country, I have never lived in the United States.” The removal eliminates a way for citizens born abroad who have never resided in the United States to signal their eligibility, potentially jeopardizing their ability to vote.
The Department of Defense used an emergency claim to bypass the normal public‑comment process, arguing the removal would prevent voter confusion and ensure compliance with federal law. After criticism, DOD opened the revised form to public comment in an effort to make the removal permanent.
Source: California Attorney General
The U.S. Constitution gives states—not the federal government—the power to set voter eligibility for federal and state elections. Thirty‑seven states and the District of Columbia allow U.S. citizens who have never lived in the United States to vote. California, for example, permits citizens born abroad who have never lived in the U.S. to vote by absentee ballot if a parent or legal guardian was last a California resident.
These states rely on the Federal Post Card Application to process absentee voting requests from overseas citizens.
U.S. citizens born abroad who have never lived in the United States may now find the standard registration form lacking a clear option to indicate their eligibility. The coalition argues the change is unlawful and would disenfranchise these voters.
People affected should review their home‑state voting instructions, submit comments during the DOD public‑comment period, and consider contacting an election‑law attorney or voter‑rights organization for guidance.
If you encounter difficulties completing the Federal Post Card Application or fear your ballot may be rejected, a lawyer experienced in election law can help you navigate state requirements and the federal comment process.
If the checkbox remains removed, citizens born abroad may face extra hurdles to prove eligibility, which could lower turnout among this group.
The challenge underscores that states, not the federal government, set voter eligibility, reinforcing state authority in election matters.
The DOD’s emergency rulemaking without public comment may be vulnerable to reversal under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Affected voters should verify their state’s absentee‑ballot rules and participate in the DOD comment process to protect their voting rights.
| Feature | Before Change | After Change |
|---|---|---|
| Never‑Resided Checkbox | Included option for citizens never lived in U.S. | Removed |
| Rulemaking Process | Standard public‑comment rulemaking | Emergency claim, later opened for comment |
| State Compatibility | Supported voting laws in 37 states + D.C. | May hinder compliance in those states |
Source: California Attorney General
Federal rules apply nationwide, but your options depend on your state and situation. Browse attorneys by practice area, then pick your state.
This article is general information based on California Attorney General and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published November 10, 2026.
Source: California Attorney General
The court will hear arguments on whether Department of Labor administrative law judges can impose heavy fines on employers under the H-2A visa program without a jury trial.
The Supreme Court will hear arguments in Nielsen v. Watanabe to decide whether people can sue federal officers for violating their constitutional rights.
On Monday the Supreme Court denied an emergency application from the Trump administration seeking to stop California from counting ballots it alleges were cast by noncitizens, allowing the state to continue its vote‑counting process.
The high court declined to block a Texas and Justice Department agreement that stops enforcement of a Biden rule letting judges pause certain deportation cases.
The Supreme Court left in place an agreement between Texas and the federal government that eliminated a rule allowing immigration judges to pause deportation cases.