image

Walmart Faces Class Action Over Alleged Mislabeling of Great Value Stevia Sweeteners

CaliforniaCourts & Legislation
Walmart Faces Class Action Over Alleged Mislabeling of Great Value Stevia Sweeteners

On October 23, 2026, a California shopper filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Walmart misled consumers by marketing its Great Value stevia sweeteners as “made with stevia extract” when the products are primarily sweetened with erythritol.

The complaint cites false‑advertising claims and violations of California consumer‑protection statutes, arguing that the labeling caused shoppers to pay more for a product whose sweetness comes mainly from a sugar alcohol.

Laboratory Findings on Product Composition

Independent testing ordered by the plaintiff’s attorneys found that the 80‑count Great Value No Calorie Stevia Packets contain about 94.44% erythritol. The 9.8‑ounce Great Value No Calorie Stevia Sweetener Sugar Substitute was found to be roughly 59.12% erythritol, with the remainder primarily dextrose and maltodextrin. Both items contain only trace amounts of rebiana, a stevia leaf extract.

Although erythritol appears on the ingredient list, the front of the package prominently displays words such as “Stevia,” “Made with Stevia Extract,” and “No Calorie,” without disclosing the proportion of erythritol.

What Affected Consumers Can Do
  1. 1Gather receipts and packaging of the purchased stevia products.
  2. 2Retain any lab test results or communications from the lawsuit.
  3. 3Monitor court filings for settlement notices or claim deadlines.
  4. 4Consider consulting a consumer‑rights attorney for advice.

Source: Courthouse News Service

Health Concerns Cited in the Complaint

The lawsuit references research linking erythritol to possible cardiovascular risks and digestive issues. The plaintiff argues that without clear disclosure, consumers cannot make informed purchasing decisions.

Who May Be Covered by the Proposed Class

The proposed class is limited to California residents who purchased the Great Value stevia products during the four years before the filing. The plaintiff’s attorney estimates the class could include hundreds of thousands of shoppers.

Video explainer: The Basics of Class Action Lawsuits — LawShelf

Practical Steps for Potential Class Members

Consumers who think they may be covered should keep receipts, packaging, and any documentation related to their purchases. While the complaint does not specify a filing deadline, class members typically must submit claims within a set period after a settlement is approved.

Reviewing ingredient labels on low‑calorie sweeteners can help shoppers avoid unexpected ingredients in the future. If you are unsure whether you have a claim, consulting a consumer‑rights attorney may provide guidance.

What this means: our conclusions

1 Good news1 Risk1 What to watch2 What to do
  1. Good newsPotential impact on product labeling

    If the case succeeds, retailers may need to disclose sweetener percentages, giving shoppers clearer information.

  2. RiskRisk for consumers buying similar items

    Shoppers could be paying premium prices for products that contain mostly sugar alcohols, not the advertised natural extract.

  3. What to watchWatch for class‑action developments

    The case’s progress will show how courts enforce labeling accuracy in food products.

  4. What to doCheck pantry labels for hidden ingredients

    Review low‑calorie sweeteners for ingredient disclosures to avoid unexpected components.

  5. What to doLegal counsel can clarify rights

    A consumer‑rights lawyer can help determine eligibility for the class and advise on next steps.

Key Findings from Laboratory Testing
ProductPrimary Sweetener Percentage
Great Value No Calorie Stevia Packets (80‑count)94.44% erythritol
Great Value No Calorie Sweetener (9.8 oz)59.12% erythritol

Source: Courthouse News Service

This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 26, 2026.

Source: Courthouse News Service

More from California

Find a lawyer in California

Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.