
Five more states have joined a federal lawsuit against telehealth provider Hims and Hers, according to an announcement from the Federal Trade Commission. The legal action alleges that the company shared sensitive health information of consumers with third-party advertising platforms while promising privacy.
The amended complaint was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It expands an initial lawsuit brought in July by the federal agency, Utah, and California through Los Angeles County Counsel.
The newly added co-plaintiffs in the lawsuit are Arizona, Florida, Nebraska, Ohio and Wisconsin. These states join Utah and California in the ongoing litigation. The Commission authorized staff to file the amended complaint in a 2-0 vote.
Prosecutors claim the company violated multiple state consumer protection laws alongside federal statutes. These include the FTC Act and the Restore Online Shoppers’ Confidence Act, as well as consumer protection laws from California and Utah.
Source: Federal Trade Commission
The lawsuit details multiple ways the telehealth provider allegedly misled consumers. First, the complaint states that the company shared consumers’ private health information with Meta, Snap and other third parties despite claiming its services protect user privacy.
Second, the complaint claims the platform hides clear disclosures about billing. Users are reportedly charged for prescriptions almost immediately after submitting an intake form, even though the service tells customers they can first consult with a medical provider to find the right treatment. The lawsuit also alleges the company makes subscription cancellations difficult.
A government complaint represents allegations that the Commission has reason to believe laws are being violated, and defendants are presumed innocent until proven otherwise. The case will ultimately be decided by the court. Ordinary people who have used online telehealth platforms should monitor their subscriptions, review billing statements, and check privacy policies to understand how their personal data is handled.
When legal disputes arise over corporate privacy practices or billing transparency, talking to an attorney may help consumers understand their rights and options.
The addition of five states signals a broader multi-state effort to crack down on alleged telehealth privacy and billing violations.
The lawsuit highlights the ongoing risks ordinary people face regarding the confidentiality of their digital health records.
The company faces formal accusations rather than a final judgment, meaning the court must decide the outcome of the claims.
Consumers using telehealth services should carefully check their subscription terms, recurring charges, and privacy disclosures.
| Allegation | Details |
|---|---|
| Privacy Practices | Shared sensitive health data with Meta, Snap and third parties. |
| Billing Practices | Charged for prescriptions immediately after intake form submission. |
| Subscription Cancellations | Made it difficult for consumers to cancel ongoing subscriptions. |
| Co-Plaintiffs | FTC, Arizona, Florida, Nebraska, Ohio, Wisconsin, Utah, California. |
Source: Federal Trade Commission
This article is general information based on Federal Trade Commission and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published November 11, 2026.
Source: Federal Trade Commission
Elvis Presley rights holders have filed a federal lawsuit against AI platform Suno, alleging unauthorized use of the singer's voice, likeness, and copyrighted music.
Two Californians claim Coca‑Cola let third‑party trackers collect data even after users turned off cookies, filing a federal suit alleging privacy violations.
A federal judge preliminarily approved a $120 million settlement with Pornhub's owner over explicit content of minors posted on its websites.
Meta, Google and TikTok have filed federal lawsuits claiming California's new law restricting addictive features for users under 16 violates the First Amendment and Section 230.
California secured a $1.8 million settlement with Lyft after finding the rideshare app forced users through complex hurdles to stop the sale of their personal data.
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.