What is the difference between mediation and arbitration?
Both keep a dispute out of a courtroom, but they do opposite things. A mediator helps the parties reach their own agreement and cannot impose anything. An arbitrator hears evidence and issues a decision, which in binding arbitration is enforceable in court and very hard to appeal.

Key takeaways
- A mediator helps the parties reach their own deal and cannot impose a decision.
- An arbitrator hears evidence and decides — binding awards are very hard to appeal.
- Mediation is usually cheaper and preserves relationships; arbitration is often faster than court.
- Many consumer and employment contracts require arbitration.
- Since 2022, workers can choose court over mandatory arbitration for sexual harassment and assault claims.
Mediation
A neutral third party facilitates negotiation, often moving between the parties in separate rooms or video breakout rooms. The mediator may point out weaknesses in each side's case and suggest compromises, but nothing is decided unless everyone agrees. A settlement becomes binding only when it is written and signed. Discussions are confidential and, in most states, cannot be used as evidence if the case later goes to trial. Many courts order mediation before a contested hearing, particularly in family and civil matters, and a large share of cases settle there. A typical civil mediation lasts a day or less.
Arbitration
A private decision-maker, or a panel of three, hears the case under agreed rules — often those of the American Arbitration Association, JAMS, FINRA for securities disputes, or an industry body — and issues an award. Arbitration looks like a simplified trial: both sides present documents and witnesses, usually with less discovery and more flexible evidence rules. In binding arbitration the award is final: the Federal Arbitration Act allows a court to vacate it only on narrow grounds such as fraud, corruption, evident partiality or an arbitrator exceeding their powers. A plain legal or factual error is not enough. Non-binding arbitration, used in some court programs, gives an advisory decision that either side can reject in favor of trial.
The practical trade-offs
- Cost. Mediation is usually the cheapest route; mediators are paid by the hour or the day, typically split between the parties. Arbitration avoids some litigation costs, but the arbitrator's fees are paid by the parties rather than the public, and in complex cases the total can approach litigation. In consumer and employment arbitration, the business usually must pay most of the fees.
- Speed. Both are faster than court; mediation can be arranged in weeks, and arbitration awards commonly come within months to a year.
- Privacy. Both are private; court filings are public.
- Control. In mediation the parties decide the outcome. In arbitration and in court, someone else does.
- Appeal. Mediation leaves rights intact until you sign. Binding arbitration removes the appeal you would have had.
- Relationships. Mediation tends to preserve business, family and co-parenting relationships better than any adversarial process.
Where it usually comes from
Not from choice, but from a clause signed long before the dispute — in an employment contract, a consumer agreement, a brokerage account, a home construction contract or a nursing home admission packet. Reading that clause is the first step in any dispute, because it decides the forum, the rules, the location and whether class claims are waived. The Supreme Court has upheld class-action waivers in arbitration agreements (AT&T Mobility v. Concepcion, 2011; Epic Systems v. Lewis, 2018).
A lawyer explains how the two processes differ in practice.
Limits on forced arbitration
Since 2022, federal law lets a person who alleges sexual harassment or sexual assault choose court even if they signed an arbitration agreement. Nursing homes may not require arbitration as a condition of admission. Some states restrict arbitration clauses in particular contracts, though the Federal Arbitration Act limits how far states can go. A clause can also be challenged in court as unconscionable — for example, if it is hidden, one-sided or makes the process unaffordable.
Med-arb and other hybrids
Some agreements provide for mediation first and arbitration only if mediation fails, sometimes with the same neutral. Many construction and commercial contracts require a series of steps — negotiation, then mediation, then arbitration or court — and skipping a step can delay or derail a claim.
Preparing for either one
Organize the key documents, calculate damages with support, and decide in advance the range you would accept. For mediation, bring someone with authority to settle. For arbitration, treat it with the seriousness of a trial, because there is usually no second chance. A lawyer experienced in the relevant field can advise on whether a clause is enforceable and how to present the case.
Community mediation centers in many cities offer free or low-cost mediation for neighbor, landlord-tenant and small consumer disputes.
Talk to a Arbitration & Mediation attorney
556 attorneys in this directory work in Arbitration & Mediation. Browse them by state and city — profiles carry direct contacts, and nobody pays for a higher position.
Find Arbitration & Mediation lawyers ›
Related questions
All legal questions › All legal issues ›
This page explains general rules in the United States and is not legal advice. Deadlines and definitions differ by state, and only a licensed attorney can tell you how the law applies to your own situation.