image

San Diego Tax Preparer Permanently Banned From Business After Criminal Conviction

CaliforniaCriminal Defense
San Diego Tax Preparer Permanently Banned From Business After Criminal Conviction

The U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California has entered a permanent civil injunction prohibiting Oladapo Olagbemi from preparing federal tax returns for any other person or entity. Olagbemi managed D.A.O. Accounting, Consulting, and Taxation, Inc., a tax return preparation business located in San Diego.

Under the court order, Olagbemi is permanently barred from preparing federal returns for others, owning any tax return preparation business, or training anyone in preparing returns. Olagbemi consented to the entry of the civil injunction.

Criminal Conviction and Financial Restitution

The civil injunction follows criminal proceedings against Olagbemi. On June 4, 2026, he pleaded guilty to four counts of aiding and assisting in the preparation of false tax returns. Following his guilty plea, he was sentenced to 18 months of imprisonment and ordered to pay approximately $1,922,887.31 in restitution to the United States.

In legal terms, restitution is a court-ordered payment requiring a convicted offender to pay money back to a victim or government entity for financial losses caused by a crime. An injunction, by contrast, is a court order that commands a person or business to refrain from performing specific actions.

Timeline of Federal Action Against San Diego Tax Preparer
  1. Olagbemi files returns with false schedules and forms.
  2. Olagbemi pleads guilty to four counts of assisting false returns.
  3. Court enters permanent civil injunction barring Olagbemi from preparing returns.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Falsification of Client Tax Schedules and Forms

According to the complaint, Olagbemi operated his business in San Diego and committed tax return falsification between 2019 and 2024. Prosecutors alleged that he falsified material information on returns he prepared to reduce or eliminate taxes owed by clients and secure unearned refunds.

To accomplish this, Olagbemi attached false schedules and forms to client tax returns. The complaint specifically stated that he included improper Schedules 1, A, C, and E, as well as Forms 2106 and Forms 5695. Deputy Assistant Attorney General Joshua Wu of the Justice Department’s Civil Division Tax Litigation Branch announced the injunction. Attorneys Kelark Azer Habashi and Jeffery N. Nunez handled the legal matter.

What This Case Means for Taxpayers

Taxpayers who use professional preparers remain personally responsible for all figures submitted on their federal returns. If a preparer files false tax forms, individual taxpayers could face government reviews, interest penalties, or unpaid tax assessments.

To protect against fraudulent operators, taxpayers can take practical steps recommended by federal authorities:

  • Check the IRS website for official guidance on selecting a qualified return preparer.
  • Use the free IRS online directory of federal tax return preparers.
  • Review the 10 tips provided by the IRS to avoid tax season fraud and protect personal financial information.
  • Consult the Justice Department’s public online list of individuals and businesses barred by court injunctions from preparing returns.

Anyone who believes a barred individual or business is violating a permanent injunction can contact the Justice Department’s Tax Litigation Branch with details.

When to Speak with a Legal Professional

If you discover that a return preparer submitted inaccurate or improper schedules on your behalf, or if you receive official notice from federal tax authorities regarding past filings, speaking with a lawyer can clarify your legal obligations. An attorney can review your tax records, guide you through official communications, and help protect your rights.

What this means: our conclusions

1 Risk1 Context2 What to do
  1. RiskImpact on Taxpayers

    Individuals who hired the preparer remain legally responsible for their filings and could face IRS reviews if false forms were submitted.

  2. ContextCombination of Civil and Criminal Sanctions

    The case demonstrates how federal prosecutors combine prison time and restitution orders with permanent civil bans to stop fraud.

  3. What to doVerification Steps Before Hiring

    Taxpayers should check the IRS online directory and the DOJ list of enjoined preparers before hiring someone to prepare their tax returns.

  4. What to doReporting Injunction Violations

    If an enjoined individual continues offering tax return preparation services, members of the public can report details to the Tax Litigation Branch.

Summary of Proceedings and Penalties
Proceeding TypeLegal OutcomeDetails
Criminal Prosecution18 months imprisonmentPleaded guilty to 4 counts on June 4, 2026
Restitution OrderApproximately $1,922,887.31Court-ordered restitution to the United States
Civil InjunctionPermanent ban on return preparationConsented to ban on owning tax businesses or training

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

Primary sources & the law

This article is general information based on U.S. Department of Justice and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published November 13, 2026.

Source: U.S. Department of Justice

More from California

Find a lawyer in California

Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.