
On October 23, 2026, a California shopper filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging that Walmart misled consumers by marketing its Great Value stevia sweeteners as “made with stevia extract” when the products are primarily sweetened with erythritol.
The complaint cites false‑advertising claims and violations of California consumer‑protection statutes, arguing that the labeling caused shoppers to pay more for a product whose sweetness comes mainly from a sugar alcohol.
Independent testing ordered by the plaintiff’s attorneys found that the 80‑count Great Value No Calorie Stevia Packets contain about 94.44% erythritol. The 9.8‑ounce Great Value No Calorie Stevia Sweetener Sugar Substitute was found to be roughly 59.12% erythritol, with the remainder primarily dextrose and maltodextrin. Both items contain only trace amounts of rebiana, a stevia leaf extract.
Although erythritol appears on the ingredient list, the front of the package prominently displays words such as “Stevia,” “Made with Stevia Extract,” and “No Calorie,” without disclosing the proportion of erythritol.
Source: Courthouse News Service
The lawsuit references research linking erythritol to possible cardiovascular risks and digestive issues. The plaintiff argues that without clear disclosure, consumers cannot make informed purchasing decisions.
The proposed class is limited to California residents who purchased the Great Value stevia products during the four years before the filing. The plaintiff’s attorney estimates the class could include hundreds of thousands of shoppers.
Consumers who think they may be covered should keep receipts, packaging, and any documentation related to their purchases. While the complaint does not specify a filing deadline, class members typically must submit claims within a set period after a settlement is approved.
Reviewing ingredient labels on low‑calorie sweeteners can help shoppers avoid unexpected ingredients in the future. If you are unsure whether you have a claim, consulting a consumer‑rights attorney may provide guidance.
If the case succeeds, retailers may need to disclose sweetener percentages, giving shoppers clearer information.
Shoppers could be paying premium prices for products that contain mostly sugar alcohols, not the advertised natural extract.
The case’s progress will show how courts enforce labeling accuracy in food products.
Review low‑calorie sweeteners for ingredient disclosures to avoid unexpected components.
A consumer‑rights lawyer can help determine eligibility for the class and advise on next steps.
| Product | Primary Sweetener Percentage |
|---|---|
| Great Value No Calorie Stevia Packets (80‑count) | 94.44% erythritol |
| Great Value No Calorie Sweetener (9.8 oz) | 59.12% erythritol |
Source: Courthouse News Service
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 26, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
A federal appeals court affirmed that the federalization of California National Guard troops in Los Angeles exceeded constitutional authority.
Senior U.S. District Judge Maxine M. Chesney denied a motion to dismiss a lawsuit by the American Solidarity Party, keeping its challenge to the "Party Preference: None" label on California ballots alive.
California AG Rob Bonta reminds voters to mail ballots a week early, notes online registration deadline Oct 19, and promotes new disability‑voting guide.
Attorney General Rob Bonta assures Californians that vote‑by‑mail remains secure for the Nov. 3, 2026 election after a U.S. Supreme Court decision.
California AG Bonta announced an agreement with Natomas Unified over student privacy violations, discriminatory discipline, and unlawful suspensions.
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in California by practice area.