
The U.S. Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division announced on Oct. 21, 2026 that Ohio State University College of Medicine (OSU Med) discriminated against white and Asian applicants in its 2023‑2025 admission cycles. The agency says the school’s practices breach Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Supreme Court’s 2023 Students for Fair Admissions v. Harvard decision, which bars race‑based admissions.
“Despite SFFA, OSU Med allows some applicants to bypass its own screening process and skip interviews solely because of the color of their skin,” Assistant Attorney General Harmeet K. Dhillon said.
OSU Med uses a “Holistic Approach” that scores each applicant in three categories: Attributes (up to 12 points), Experiences (up to 16 points) and Metrics (up to 8 points). After scoring, candidates must interview. The DOJ found that Black applicants who were screened and interviewed were about 2.8 times as likely to be admitted as Asian applicants with identical credentials.
The investigation also uncovered a “side door” that lets some candidates receive admission without a screener score or an interview. Using that pathway in 2024 and 2025, Black applicants were four times as likely to be admitted as white applicants, and no Asian applicants were admitted through the side door.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
Title VI prohibits discrimination based on race or color in any program that receives federal funds. Medical schools receive substantial federal assistance, so they must follow Title VI. The Supreme Court’s 2023 SFFA decision reinforced that any race‑conscious admissions policy is unlawful.
If you are applying to a federally funded college or university, the DOJ’s findings suggest you have a right to a race‑neutral admissions process. The department said it will negotiate a settlement with OSU Med to change the practices; if negotiations fail, it may file a lawsuit.
Anyone who believes they were denied admission because of race can file a complaint with the DOJ’s civil‑rights portal. The release did not specify a filing deadline, but prompt reporting helps the investigation.
Applicants who suspect discrimination should consider consulting an attorney experienced in civil‑rights or education law. A lawyer can advise on filing a complaint, gathering evidence, and navigating any future litigation.
If the DOJ reaches a settlement, OSU Med will likely have to eliminate race‑based shortcuts, leading to a more uniform admissions process.
Other federally funded schools may face similar investigations, prompting them to review and possibly revise their admissions criteria.
Prospective students can expect admissions decisions to be based on credentials rather than race, though they should remain vigilant for hidden biases.
Submit a report to the DOJ’s civil‑rights portal promptly to trigger an investigation and preserve your rights.
A civil‑rights attorney can help you document evidence and navigate the complaint process effectively.
| Race | Likelihood of Admission |
|---|---|
| Black (screened & interviewed) | 2.8 × higher than Asian |
| Black (side‑door, 2024‑2025) | 4 × higher than White |
| Asian (screened & interviewed) | Baseline |
| White (side‑door, 2024‑2025) | Baseline |
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
This article is general information based on U.S. Department of Justice and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 21, 2026.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
Federal authorities announced indictments, arrests, and device seizures targeting North Korean remote IT worker schemes that affected over 70 U.S. companies.
A federal court has temporarily stopped Digital Forensics Corporation and its CEO from allegedly defrauding sextortion victims out of at least $60 million.
No attorneys in Ohio are listed in our directory yet. Lawyers are licensed state by state, so before hiring, check that the attorney is admitted to practice in Ohio.