
A federal appeals court has invalidated the Federal Reserve Board’s long-standing 21-cent cap on debit card swipe fees, ruling that regulators exceeded their legal authority when setting the limit. The decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit requires the central bank to rewrite rules governing transaction fees charged by financial institutions.
The ruling affirms a 2025 decision from the U.S. District Court for the District of North Dakota in favor of Corner Post, a North Dakota convenience store that challenged the regulations in 2021. The outcome forces the Federal Reserve to recalculate interchange fee limits for banks holding over $10 billion in assets.
Enacted in 2010, the Durbin Amendment directed the Federal Reserve to ensure that debit card interchange fees were reasonable and proportional to the actual incremental cost of processing a transaction. However, when the Fed established the nationwide 21-cent cap, it factored in fixed operational overhead, including computer hardware, software, labor, and fraud prevention expenses.
U.S. Circuit Judge David Stras, writing for the Eighth Circuit, rejected that approach. The court held that the statute limits fee calculations to marginal costs—the specific expense added by processing one individual debit transaction. Judge Stras noted that future fee rules cannot be based on fixed hardware, software, or network connectivity costs.
While striking down the original formula, the court noted that the Federal Reserve does not have to calculate exact penny costs for every individual transaction across the nation. Instead, regulators may use economic shortcuts to establish an average variable cost for covered financial institutions.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Corner Post originally faced procedural hurdles when challenging the fee cap because the rule had been in effect for years before the store filed suit. However, a landmark 2024 U.S. Supreme Court ruling determined that the six-year statutory clock for challenging federal administrative rules begins only when a plaintiff suffers actual injury, rather than when the rule is issued.
Because Corner Post opened for business years after the 21-cent cap took effect, the Supreme Court’s decision cleared the way for its federal lawsuit to proceed on the merits in North Dakota.
The ruling directly impacts retail businesses, financial institutions with more than $10 billion in assets, and payment processing networks. Merchants who accept debit cards may see changes in their transaction expenses once the Federal Reserve issues a revised rule.
Here is how key groups are affected and what steps may follow:
As federal agencies revise complex financial regulations, businesses and institutions face shifting compliance obligations. Speaking with a qualified attorney can help business owners understand their rights regarding processing fees, statutory deadlines, and evolving federal rules.
The invalidation of the 21-cent cap leaves merchants and payment processors waiting for the Federal Reserve to issue a revised fee structure.
Banks with over $10 billion in assets face potential reductions in swipe fee revenue if future caps are strictly limited to variable transaction costs.
The case highlights how newer businesses can challenge federal agency rules years after enactment based on the Supreme Court's 2024 injury rule.
Observers will watch whether the Fed revives its stalled 14.4-cent proposal or creates tiered caps based on asset size, volume, and geography.
Business owners should monitor upcoming Federal Reserve rulemaking and consult counsel regarding contractual card-processing fee terms.
| Framework | Fee Limit | Included Cost Factors |
|---|---|---|
| Original Fed Standard | 21 cents | Incremental costs plus fixed hardware, software, and fraud prevention |
| 2023 Proposed Fed Standard | 14.4 cents | Stalled due to banking industry opposition |
| Eighth Circuit Mandate | To be determined | Must reflect marginal variable costs; excludes fixed operational expenses |
Source: Courthouse News Service
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 26, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
No attorneys in North Dakota are listed in our directory yet. Lawyers are licensed state by state, so before hiring, check that the attorney is admitted to practice in North Dakota.