
A New Mexico judge on Oct. 21 ordered Meta Platforms Inc. to pay the state $25 billion in civil penalties after a jury found the company intentionally misled consumers about data privacy and control.
The jury had originally awarded $219 billion, based on 44 million violations of the New Mexico Unfair Practices Act, each carrying a maximum $5,000 fine. Judge Frances Mathew reduced the amount, though the calculation was not explained.
The jury concluded Meta made 26 false or misleading statements about user privacy, including promises to let users control advertiser access and a broken vow to stop third‑party access to friends’ data. Evidence showed Meta conducted only 14 audits despite “thousands” of suspicious applications and failed to notify users of data misuse.
Source: Courthouse News Service
Jurors assigned 2.1 million violations—the population of New Mexico—to each statement appearing in major news outlets, and 1.4 million violations to each statement made through Meta’s own channels, reflecting the estimated number of New Mexicans with Facebook accounts in 2020. The statutory maximum of $5,000 per violation led to the $219 billion figure, which the judge later cut to $25 billion.
The penalty underscores that companies can be held financially accountable for deceptive privacy practices. While the $25 billion order applies to Meta, it does not create a direct claim for individual users. However, the case may encourage stricter scrutiny of privacy statements and could lead to more enforcement actions. Consumers should review the privacy settings on their social‑media accounts, stay informed about how their data is used, and keep records of any communications from platforms about data handling.
Meta’s chief legal officer said the company will appeal the decision, arguing the lawsuit amounts to a “tax on speech.” The appeal will likely focus on the size of the penalty and the application of the Unfair Practices Act.
Anyone who believes they have been harmed by Meta’s privacy practices may consider consulting an attorney to explore possible claims, especially if they reside in New Mexico.
The reduced but still massive penalty shows courts are willing to use state consumer‑protection laws to punish deceptive data practices.
Companies could increase audits and transparency to avoid similar penalties, benefiting users who want clearer data controls.
Other states may follow New Mexico’s approach, expanding the risk of large civil penalties for privacy misrepresentations.
The appeal will add legal expenses and uncertainty, which could affect Meta’s financial planning and user‑trust initiatives.
Check and tighten privacy settings on Facebook and Instagram now, and keep any notices about data use for future reference.
| Metric | Amount |
|---|---|
| Jury‑Awarded Penalty | $219 billion |
| Judge‑Reduced Penalty | $25 billion |
| Maximum Fine per Violation | $5,000 |
| Violations Assigned per Statement (news) | 2.1 million |
| Violations Assigned per Statement (company) | 1.4 million |
Source: Courthouse News Service
This article is general information based on Courthouse News Service and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 22, 2026.
Source: Courthouse News Service
A New Mexico judge reduced a jury-ordered $219 billion penalty against Meta to $25 billion following a trial over consumer data privacy practices.
No attorneys in New Mexico are listed in our directory yet. Lawyers are licensed state by state, so before hiring, check that the attorney is admitted to practice in New Mexico.