Federal Trade Commission Settlement Forces Auto Group to Disclose True Car Prices
The Federal Trade Commission announced an agreement with Greenway Auto Group on October 8, 2026, to settle a lawsuit targeting deceptive car pricing advertisements. Filed in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Orlando Division, the proposed stipulated order mandates that the company prominently feature the actual price a buyer must pay for a vehicle.
Allegations of hidden fees and misleading ads
According to the FTC complaint, Greenway inflated vehicle prices for the vast majority of consumers by tacking on mandatory packages, penalties, and fees. The lawsuit states that Greenway charged consumers more than $3,350 over the advertised price in over 92% of transactions. These extra costs allegedly included administrative, dealer, delivery, and processing fees, alongside conditional rebates limited to a select group of shoppers.
Prohibition of scam mailers and false claims
Beyond price transparency requirements, the proposed order bars Greenway from using deceptive prize mailers that promised cash prizes which did not exist. The FTC reported that these mailers were used to lure shoppers into dealerships. Furthermore, the order prohibits the company from misrepresenting whether financing sources, fees, taxes, or services are optional or required.
What this means for car buyers
Under the terms of the settlement, Greenway must ensure that its advertisements prominently display the real price a consumer must pay, excluding only government-required charges like taxes. The Bureau of Consumer Protection previously warned the company in March 2026 about misleading advertising practices, but the FTC alleged Greenway responded by adding false transparency assurances to its websites while maintaining lower advertised prices. Stipulated orders hold the force of law once a District Court judge approves and signs them.
For ordinary car shoppers, this case highlights the importance of carefully examining advertised prices versus final paperwork to spot unexpected add-ons. Consumers who encounter hidden fees or misleading promotional mailers can review their sales contracts closely to see if charges match advertised claims. Anyone who believes they were subjected to misleading sales practices or overcharges may want to consult an attorney to understand their rights and explore potential options.
What this means: our conclusions
- Good newsGreater clarity for prospective vehicle buyers
The settlement ensures that advertised prices reflect what consumers actually owe, reducing unexpected costs at the dealership.
- What to watchBroader enforcement risks for auto dealers
Automotive retailers hiding mandatory fees in their advertisements could face similar scrutiny and federal lawsuits.
- What to doBuyers must still check final paperwork
Consumers should review purchase agreements carefully to verify that no unauthorized fees were added to the final sale.
- ContextWider regulatory push on hidden fees
The FTC continues targeting price transparency violations across multiple sectors, including housing, ticketing, and delivery markets.
- What to doLegal recourse for affected shoppers
Individuals who faced hidden charges may want to consult an attorney to evaluate potential private claims or remedies.
| Issue Category | FTC Allegations | Settlement / Order Requirement |
|---|---|---|
| Vehicle Pricing | Charged over $3,350 extra in 92% of sales | Must include actual price in ads minus government fees |
| Promotional Mailers | Used scam mailers promising false cash prizes | Prohibited from using deceptive prize mailers |
| Fee Disclosures | Misrepresented optional versus required fees | Banned from misrepresenting optional or required charges |
Source: Federal Trade Commission
- proposed order ftc.gov
- complaint ftc.gov
- March 2026 letter ftc.gov
This article is general information based on Federal Trade Commission and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 8, 2026.
Source: Federal Trade Commission
Florida AG seeks court order to force Meta to revamp teen safety features
Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a motion asking a state court to block Meta from deceptive practices and to require new safety measures for minors on Instagram and Facebook.
Florida Asks State Court for Emergency Limits on Teen Meta Use
Florida is asking a state court for a temporary injunction to restrict minors' access to Meta platforms, pushing for strict teen screen time limits.
Florida Lab Vice President Convicted of Medicare Fraud Over Unnecessary COVID Tests
A federal jury found a Florida testing‑lab vice president guilty of billing Medicare more than $15 million for blood tests patients never needed during the pandemic.
Federal judge rules non‑citizen voting ban unconstitutional, says states set voting rules
A Southern District of Florida judge dismissed a criminal case against a Jamaican woman accused of voting, holding that only states may regulate voter qualifications and that the 1996 federal ban on non‑citizen voting is unconstitutional.
Find a lawyer in Florida
Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in Florida by practice area.