DOJ, USDA launch nationwide SNAP fraud crackdown, $42 M alleged loss
The Justice Department’s National Fraud Enforcement Division, the U.S. Department of Agriculture and the USDA Office of Inspector General announced a coordinated enforcement surge aimed at fraud in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). The effort, carried out between Sept. 1 and Oct. 21, 2026, involved the Fraud Division, 13 U.S. Attorney’s Offices and the Utah Attorney General’s Office.
Scope of the operation
Law‑enforcement officials say the actions targeted more than 40 defendants and alleged schemes that could have cost the federal government almost $45 million, with nearly $42 million tied to SNAP benefit fraud. One case involved an attempted fraud against a USDA crop‑insurance program for farmers.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
Key indictments
Two high‑profile indictments were highlighted. In Ohio, Jorag Yaseen and Rami Kanaan were charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud, wire fraud and money‑laundering for allegedly using stolen EBT account information to process thousands of fraudulent purchases, causing an estimated $29.7 million loss.
In Georgia, rapper‑influencer Mercedes New (aka Shawty Dred) was indicted on criminal food‑stamp fraud, mail fraud, access‑device fraud and aggravated identity theft. Prosecutors say he accessed more than 350 SNAP accounts through an automated phone system, generating about $1.8 million in fraudulent transactions, of which roughly $635,000 went through his own retail store.
Impact on SNAP recipients
Officials stressed that SNAP fraud harms both taxpayers and low‑income families who rely on the program for food. A mother whose EBT card was compromised described having to take out loans and experience anxiety when her card was declined at a grocery store.
What this means for everyday people
If you receive SNAP benefits, monitor your EBT card activity closely and report any unauthorized transactions to your state SNAP agency immediately. The Justice Department has not announced a public deadline for reporting, but prompt notification can help stop further loss and may protect you from being implicated in a fraud scheme.
Anyone who suspects fraud—whether a retailer, a family member, or a friend—should contact local law‑enforcement or the USDA Office of Inspector General. Cooperation with investigators can lead to quicker resolution and may prevent further criminal activity.
People who feel they have been wrongly accused or who need help navigating the legal process should consider consulting an attorney experienced in criminal defense or public‑benefit law.
What this means: our conclusions
- Good newsIncreased enforcement may deter future fraud
The coordinated surge signals a tougher stance on SNAP fraud, which could reduce illegal schemes and protect benefits for needy families.
- RiskFraud schemes can affect innocent recipients
Unauthorized use of EBT cards can leave legitimate users without food assistance, creating immediate hardship.
- What to watchWatch for further investigations
The DOJ and USDA indicated this surge is only the beginning; more cases may be announced as investigations continue.
- What to doStay vigilant with your EBT card
Regularly check transaction history and report any unknown activity to your state SNAP agency right away.
- What to doLegal help may be needed if accused
If you are charged with SNAP fraud, an experienced criminal‑defense attorney can protect your rights and advise on next steps.
- National Fraud Enforcement Division justice.gov
Find a lawyer for this issue
Federal rules apply nationwide, but your options depend on your state and situation. Browse attorneys by practice area, then pick your state.
This article is general information based on U.S. Department of Justice and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 21, 2026.
Source: U.S. Department of Justice
Supreme Court Agrees to Review 158-Year-Old Federal Backyard Liquor Ban
The Supreme Court will examine a 1868 federal law criminalizing home distilling after lower appeals courts reached opposite conclusions.
Supreme Court likely to keep current deference to sentencing guidelines commentary
At oral arguments in Beaird v. United States, the justices showed little appetite for overturning the 1993 Stinson rule that gives weight to the Sentencing Commission’s advisory commentary.
10th Circuit Rules Defendants Must Prove Native American Status in Tribal Land Crimes
A federal appeals court decided that criminal defendants asserting Native American status as a defense on tribal land bear the burden of proof.
Justice Department and IRS Target Tax Fraud in Nationwide Sweep
Federal authorities launched a national tax enforcement surge, taking action against 76 defendants over an estimated $490 million in tax fraud schemes.
Supreme Court weighs agency deference in firearm sentencing case
The Court heard arguments about whether judges must follow the U.S. Sentencing Commission’s definition of large‑capacity magazines in a Texas felon's firearm case.