image

Florida AG seeks court order to force Meta to revamp teen safety features

FloridaIP & Technology
Florida AG seeks court order to force Meta to revamp teen safety features

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier filed a motion on October 8, 2026 in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court seeking an injunction against Meta Platforms. The request aims to limit child access to Instagram and Facebook, make safety information clearer, improve reporting of child sexual exploitation, and disable features that encourage excessive teen use.

Legal basis and allegations

The state is suing under the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act, which bars deceptive, unfair or unconscionable conduct. Uthmeier says Meta’s own research shows its apps cause anxiety, depression, eating disorders and expose minors to predators, yet the company marketed the platforms as safe for kids.

Possible next steps if injunction is granted
  1. 1Meta adds stricter age‑verification for new users
  2. 2Safety information becomes more prominent in the apps
  3. 3Reporting tools for child sexual exploitation are upgraded
  4. 4Features that promote excessive scrolling are disabled or limited

Source: JURIST

Comparison to other actions

Florida declined to join a settlement reached by 47 states that imposed an $18 billion penalty on Meta, arguing the deal was too weak. The AG points to a New Mexico consumer‑protection case that forced age‑verification and added child‑exploitation safeguards, saying Florida wants similar relief.

What this means for parents and teens

If the court grants the injunction, Meta could be required to add stricter age checks, clearer safety notices and new limits on features that keep teens scrolling. Parents should monitor their children’s social‑media use and be prepared to adjust privacy settings if new rules are imposed. No specific deadline is mentioned in the filing.

Video explainer: Meta reaches $17B settlement with states over teen social media addiction — Associated Press

Next steps and potential impact

The motion adds to a wave of state‑level lawsuits targeting social‑media companies for harms to minors. While the case is still pending, it signals that Florida may pursue stronger consumer‑protection tools if the current lawsuit succeeds. Affected users should stay alert for any court orders that could change how Meta’s apps operate in the state.

Anyone concerned about how these developments could affect their family’s online safety may want to consult an attorney experienced in technology and consumer‑protection law.

What this means: our conclusions

1 Good news2 What to watch1 Context1 What to do
  1. Good newsPotential new safety rules for teens

    If the court orders relief, Meta may have to add stricter age checks and limit features that encourage excessive use, improving online safety for minors.

  2. What to watchFlorida’s stance differs from other states

    By refusing the $18 billion settlement, Florida signals it wants stronger, enforceable protections rather than financial penalties alone.

  3. ContextImpact on Meta’s business practices

    An injunction could force Meta to redesign parts of Instagram and Facebook, potentially affecting user experience and advertising revenue.

  4. What to doWhat parents should do now

    Watch for any court orders and be ready to adjust privacy settings or use parental‑control tools on Meta’s platforms.

  5. What to watchBroader legal trend

    The case adds to a growing wave of state lawsuits targeting social‑media companies for alleged harms to children, which could shape future regulations.

Primary sources & the law

This article is general information based on JURIST and court or agency records available at publication time. It is not legal advice; laws and deadlines differ by state and by case. Published October 8, 2026.

Source: JURIST

More from Florida

Find a lawyer in Florida

Reading about the law is one thing, applying it to your own case is another. Browse verified attorneys in Florida by practice area.